Martin AM-1 Mauler
Siga
S
u m m a r y
|
Catalogue No.: |
SG72014 |
Contents and Media: |
177 parts in white styrene; one part
in clear; markings for three aircraft |
Scale: |
1/72 |
Price: |
USD$16.96
from Squadron.com |
Review Type: |
FirstLook |
Advantages: |
Interesting subject; great variety
and quantity of ordnance; separate cowl flap parts; fairly delicately
recessed panel lines; some options (eg propeller blades); good value with
the inclusion of ordnance. |
Disadvantages: |
Some soft mouldings and indifferent
details (eg cockpit); inaccurate flaps and main undercarriage bays; thickness of some parts overscale; fine, ragged
flash on many parts; clear canopy not up to the standard of the rest of
the kit. |
Recommendation: |
Recommended. |
Reviewed by Brett Green
Siga's 1/72 scale Martin Mauler
is available
online from Squadron.com
Siga is a relatively new company from the Ukraine that produces
limited-run model kits. Unlike some recent releases of kits including
MPM's Wellington or Classic Airframes' latest offerings, Siga's models are
the product of a less sophisticated moulding process using fairly soft
plastic, resulting in some soft detail, flash on many parts and reasonably
thick sprue attachment points.
Having said that, my overall impression of Siga's 1/72 scale Martin AM-1
Mauler is very good indeed.
The kit comprises 80 parts in white styrene and one in clear styrene for
the aircraft itself, and a further 97 parts for the ordnance options. The
white plastic is quite soft and thick in places, but Siga has managed the
limitations of the moulding process so that trailing edges of flying
surfaces are acceptably thin and recessed panel lines are crisp and
consistent. The overall shape of the aircraft looks good too.
Click the thumbnails below to view larger
images:
Some nice touches include optional style propeller blades and spinners;
and separate pieces for the side cowl flaps, lower cowl flap and lower
mid-fuselage speed brake. Wheels and wing guns are fairly awful, but an
average modellers "spares box" should provide some assistance in these
areas. The cockpit is sparsely detailed with decals supplied for side
consoles and the instrument panel, however the two-piece seat looks okay.
The
clear canopy is supplied in one piece, and is not exactly sparkling. We
can hope that Squadron or Falcon will release a vacform replacement for
this part.
Ordnance options include Mk 13-2 aerial torpedos, 750 lb bombs, 250 lb
bombs, AN/APS-4 search radar pod, 11/75" Tiny Tim rockets, 5" HVAR ground
attack rockets and launchers.
These parts come with their own detailed painting, placement and assembly
instructions.
The kit instructions are straightforward, as befitting the simple
engineering of the model.
Three decal options are offered. The marking options offer any colour the
modeller might want, as long as it is overall Gloss Sea Blue! Splashes of
colour are available with green fin and spinner tips on one option.
A Footnote on Accuracy
After I originally posting this review, Phil Juvet has offered his opinion
on the accuracy of some aspects of the Siga Mauler based on his first-hand
observation and photographs of the type. Phil advises the following:
"The two main problems with the AM-1 kit, suggested by your photos of the
sprues, are:
-
The main wheel wells are incorrectly placed too far forward. The back of
the wheel wells are hard against the leading edge of the flaps on the real
aircraft. There is a notch in the flap leading edge where the tire sits
when the gear is retracted.
-
The arrangement of the flaps/dive brakes themselves is inaccurate. On the
real aircraft, the flaps split in half when used as dive brakes and
resemble combs; one half of the comb's teeth going up and the other half
going down. I see no engraving on the flaps to show this (editor's note
- actually, the box art shows this "comb" arrangement to good effect but
there is no corresponding scribing on the kit flaps). What I do
see is a notch in the spar between the front and rear wheel wells; this
does not exist on the real bird. It was flush to the skin (see Czech
Master wing photo below for accurate arrangment). The gear strut was below
the wing surface in a fairing when retracted. I have photos of the real
aircraft to show this."
Click the thumbnails below to view a second
photo of the rear main wheel well, and of the lower wing on the Czech
Master Resin kit which accurately depicts the wheel well arrangement:
Suggested Corrections
Modellers with moderate skills should be able to address the accuracy
issues raised by Phil.
-
Although it will be a tedious job, the "combs" on the flaps could be
scribed.
-
The rear undercarriage problem noted by Phil Juvet is compounded by a
stepped main wheel bay. The real Mauler had a perfectly circular bay for
the main wheel. Furthermore, the diameter of the smaller, rear half of the
wheel well is actually too small to accommodate the main wheel. This
problem can be corrected by enlarging the wheel well "hole" so that the
entire circle is the diameter of the larger, forward half of the wheel
well. This should have the bonus benefit of making the wheel well reach
the leading edge of the flap, thus correcting that problem too.
-
The spar between the front and rear of the main gear bay can be removed
and replaced with a small block of styrene glued flush with the wing's
lower surface. If you perform this surgery you will also need to shorten
the retraction struts.
If you are a fan of late 1940s and early 1950s Naval Aviation and you
build 1/72 scale models, you should enjoy Siga's Martin Mauler. The
limited run nature of the kit means that each part will require a few
minutes' attention for cleanup and checking alignment, but nothing to
stretch the average modeller.
The inclusion of the ordnance, offered as a separate item in previous
boxings of the kit, make the package look like even better value.
The accuracy issues related to the main gear bay and the flaps are
disappointing but not insurmountable.
Recommended.
Thanks to Squadron for the review sample.
Review Copyright © 2002 by
Brett Green
Page Created 18 August, 2002
Last updated 22 July, 2003
Back to HyperScale
Main Page
Back to Reviews
Page
|